asb added a comment. Thanks, I'll take another look. Rereading my previous comment I just wanted to clarify one part so it's not misunderstood. I said " I think it's unfortunate that this need for the ABI hasn't translated into effort to finalise the ABI definition in the psABI doc and to at least get it to match what GCC actually implements" - I wanted to be __very__ clear this isn't a criticism of those trying to maintain the ABI doc, it's about companies who want to ship RVE hardware and software not contributing to that process.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D70401/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D70401 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
