asl wrote: > Got it. Thanks. Then I am wondering how about the `retcon` ABI? I am confused > since the doc said the last continuation of `retcon` ABI will return a > nullptr to indicate it has finished. Don't we have the same problem? Or we > can't solve the problem in `retcon` ABI? Or we just don't want to solve that > in the current PR?
Ah, ok. The current PR is only for `retcon.once` coroutines. I do not have a good use-case for `retcon` ones and they are lowered differently enough, so I decided not to touch them. If / when there will be a viable usecase, I will try to generalize the present implementation to generic `retcon` coroutines. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66333 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
