ChuanqiXu9 wrote: Oh, I am wondering if we have misunderstandings. I am not asking the reason why we don't have the problem which is discussing in the change of CoroFrame.cpp in return continuation ABI. I understand that fully.
What make me curious is the motivation case of the PR. I mean what can be presented in retcon.once ABI after the PR which is impossible/hard before. And how do we handle that in retcon ABI. Sorry for confusion. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66333 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
