cor3ntin added a comment.

In D159345#4640147 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D159345#4640147>, @tahonermann 
wrote:

> Even better than I asked for. I held back on suggesting the change of `Tok` 
> to `Result` to match `tryConsumeIdentifierUCN()`, but you made that change 
> anyway! You must have read my mind! :)

Haha. Once i added docs the lack of symmetry with the previous function became 
jarring!
Thanks!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D159345/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D159345

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to