craig.topper added a comment. In D152279#4612087 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D152279#4612087>, @MaskRay wrote:
> I am still interested in moving this forward. What should be done here? If > the decision is to keep the current odd default 8 for > `toolchains::RISCVToolChain`, I guess I'll have to take the compromise as > making a step forward is better than nothing. On 1 RV64 CPU I tried in our RTL simulator, changing from 8 to 0 reduced dhrystone score by 2.7%. Using 16, or 32 gave the same score as 8. Reducing 8 to 4 improved the score by 0.5%. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D152279/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D152279 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
