asb added a comment. In D152279#4612099 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D152279#4612099>, @craig.topper wrote:
> In D152279#4612087 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D152279#4612087>, @MaskRay wrote: > >> I am still interested in moving this forward. What should be done here? If >> the decision is to keep the current odd default 8 for >> `toolchains::RISCVToolChain`, I guess I'll have to take the compromise as >> making a step forward is better than nothing. > > On 1 RV64 CPU I tried in our RTL simulator, changing from 8 to 0 reduced > dhrystone score by 2.7%. Using 16, or 32 gave the same score as 8. Reducing 8 > to 4 improved the score by 0.5%. Thanks for testing - do you have a view one way or another on this default? I'm somewhat torn personally. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D152279/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D152279 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
