shenhan marked 3 inline comments as done.
shenhan added inline comments.

================
Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetPassConfig.cpp:1278
     }
-    addPass(createMachineFunctionSplitterPass());
+    if (TM->getTargetTriple().isX86())
+      addPass(createMachineFunctionSplitterPass());
----------------
shenhan wrote:
> snehasish wrote:
> > Can you coordinate with @dhoekwater ? He has some patches in flight for 
> > AArch64. 
> > 
> > I think D157157 is the one which modifies the same logic.
> Thanks. Yes, I'll coordinate with @dhoekwater before resolving this.
@dhoekwater will rebase D157157 on top of this.


================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/mfs-triple.ll:8
+
+define void @foo4(i1 zeroext %0, i1 zeroext %1) nounwind {
+  br i1 %0, label %3, label %7
----------------
snehasish wrote:
> Any reason why we can't use the bitcode already in 
> test/CodeGen/machine-function-splitter.ll? (Going to be moved to 
> test/Generic/machine-function-splitter.ll in D157563)
> 
> IMO we can just reuse the basic test and add these run and check lines.
Moved the tests into machine-function-splitter.ll. Either this CL or D157563 
can be submitted first, and the other will rebase on top of that.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D157750/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D157750

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to