aaron.ballman added a comment. Given the views expressed on this thread, I think this requires a wider community discussion to determine whether we want to support this idea or not, regardless of -cc1 or driver-level option. We should not be adding a novel language dialect as we're getting ready to cut a release unless the need and benefits are *very* compelling, and I don't think that's the case here. We need the time to think about the long-term effects of such a mode, so I don't think Clang 17 is an appropriate ship vehicle for this change, especially because Google can carry this patch in your downstream easily enough.
My recommendation is to start an RFC on Discourse. If the community quickly and decisively agrees this should land in Clang 17 in the next few days, it might still be reasonable to make the rc2 cutoff, but I'd leave that decision to the release managers and it would be contingent on strong libc++ maintainer agreement to whatever direction we go (because they'll be the most impacted by this decision). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
