Endill added a comment. In D156247#4541756 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247#4541756>, @ilya-biryukov wrote:
> @aaron.ballman the internal -cc1 flag > > - internal `clang -cc1 -fno-coroutines`. I'm sorry, but I find this wording misleading. `-cc1 -fno-coroutines` is not internal in the same sense as e.g. `-verify` is. Both are hidden from user-facing drivers, but unlike `-verify`, potential `-cc1 -fno-coroutines` is not just intended, but focused on users outside of monorepo. So I'd say it's going to be hidden but user-facing feature, rather than internal one. And the one that we should document and test if not for users, then for ourselves to make sure we maintain its semantics and don't break users. At this point I'd say if we go for it, we should go for proper driver option, rather than frontend one. I also wonder how much complexity this language dialect would introduce while interacting with other language dialect flags. Is it really worth it? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
