nickdesaulniers added a comment.
In D151587#4523571 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151587#4523571>, @efriedma wrote:
>> restore E->getStorageDuration() == SD_Static check to fix libcxx regressions
>
> Makes sense... but it would be nice to add a testcase for whatever construct
> was triggering this.
#include <string>
#include <tuple>
constexpr bool test() {
std::tuple<int, char const*> a = {34, "hello world"};
std::pair<long, std::string> p;
p = a;
return true;
}
int main(int, char**) {
static_assert(test());
return 0;
}
was the furthest I was able to reproduce. Not sure we should be using `std::`
in clang/test/Sema; wasn't really able to reduce further.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151587/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151587
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
