probinson marked an inline comment as done. probinson added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Headers/avx2intrin.h:412 +/// vectors of [16 x i16] and returns the lower 16 bits of each difference +/// in an element of the [16 x i16] result (overflow is ignored). +/// Differences from \a __a are returned in the lower 64 bits of each ---------------- pengfei wrote: > underflow? I don't often see "underflow" applied to integer operations. Technically, any signed add or subtract could either overflow or underflow, depending on the sign and magnitude of the operands. I think just saying "overflow" is clear enough? ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Headers/avx2intrin.h:448 +/// vectors of [8 x i32] and returns the lower 32 bits of each difference in +/// an element of the [8 x i31] result (overflow is ignored). Differences +/// from \a __a are returned in the lower 64 bits of each 128-bit half of ---------------- pengfei wrote: > pengfei wrote: > > typo or intended? > underflow. The `i31` is a typo, fixed. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150114/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150114 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits