codemzs added a comment. Hi @rjmccall and @erichkeane,
I would like to inquire about the necessity of implementing excess precision support for `std::bfloat16_t` in this patch. In reference to the discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D136919, it was mentioned that introducing `std::bfloat16_t` in Clang requires proper mangling, semantics, and excess precision support. However, this change includes a front-end flag that enables `bfloat16` arithmetic only when the target natively supports `bfloat16` operations. Given this restriction, is it still essential to provide excess precision support for `std::bfloat16_t` in this patch? Thank you for your guidance. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D149573/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D149573 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
