shafik added subscribers: aaron.ballman, rsmith.
shafik added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr18xx.cpp:139
+namespace dr1890 { // dr1890: no drafting
+// FIXME: all the examples are well-formed.
----------------
So this is still in drafting:
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1890
We saw this in Issaquah and we felt like 1890 would probably be resolved once
we resolve 2335:
https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_active.html#2335
I think we are leaning towards these being well-formed but we won't really know
till it is resolved.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr23xx.cpp:42
+namespace dr2335 { // dr2335: no drafting
+// FIXME: all of the examples are well-formed.
----------------
My comment on 1890 applies here as well.
CC @rsmith @aaron.ballman how should we handle DRs that are still in process?
While we may think we know the direction it is going in, it could change.
So maybe we should avoid expressing an opinion on whether these are well-formed
or not?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D148433/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D148433
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
