HazardyKnusperkeks added a comment. In D147176#4232633 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147176#4232633>, @MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> Honestly these developers are pretty much 'OGs' , I'm happy to tidy up after > them if they don't quite follow our current conventions. Obviously at any > point you can add yourself to a review and add the appropriate tags. Would you also please be so kind to sort the parsing function? I have currently no working clang-format development setup because of a change of hardware. > Phabractor does support automatically assigned code reviewers via the > "Owners" package, and via Herald rules. I could see if I can add one to at > least auto assign the clang-format tag, that should bring it onto our radar > > H987 Clang Format, Tags and Reviewers <https://reviews.llvm.org/H987> That's nice, I've subscribed to the clang-format tag. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D147176/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D147176 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
