fangism added a comment. In D144603#4163751 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D144603#4163751>, @phosek wrote:
> In D144603#4162974 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D144603#4162974>, @haowei wrote: > >> I think remove the compiler launcher from default pass through flags are >> fine. What about the using compiler launcher in runtime builds? I don't >> think we should read `CLANG_BOOTSTRAP_PASSTHROUGH` to determine if we should >> pass through compiler launcher flags. > > I'd suggest a similar approach, that is remove `C_COMPILER_LAUNCHER` and > `CXX_COMPILER_LAUNCHER` from the default passthrough list and provide a new > `LLVM_EXTERNAL_PROJECT_PASSTHROUGH` variable. Will the PASSTHROUGH approach let us choose a //different// LAUNCHER for the external projects? For example, we could still distribute those compiles, albeit without expecting any caching. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D144603/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D144603 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
