Ayal added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaOpenCL/invalid-kernel-parameters.cl:90
+#if __OPENCL_C_VERSION__ <= CL_VERSION_1_2
typedef struct FooImage2D // expected-note{{within field of type 'FooImage2D'
declared here}}
----------------
yaxunl wrote:
> Ayal wrote:
> > yaxunl wrote:
> > > we should not limit the tests to CL1.2. We should test them with 2.0 to
> > > make sure there is no diagnostics.
> > >
> > > To differentiate between 1.2 and 2.0 you can use -verify=ocl12 and
> > > -verify=ocl20.
> > >
> > > same as below
> > Using -verify=ocl12 and -verify=ocl20 should probably be done separately as
> > an NFC patch as it involves many changes IIUC.
> >
> > The expect's were placed under #ifdef instead (and only them), following
> > e.g. existing lines 8-12.
> you can use -verify=expected,ocl12 for OCL1.2 and -verify for OCL2.0 then the
> common diagnostics are kept as 'expected-*' and unchanged. you only need to
> change the ocl1.2 specific diagnostics to 'ocl12-*'.
>
> For example,
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/test/SemaOpenCL/atomic-ops.cl
Ah, ok, done, thanks!
(Note that atomic-ops.cl uses only `expected`'s, some of which are placed under
#if, as done elsewhere in this test file.)
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D143849/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D143849
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
