Endill marked an inline comment as not done.
Endill added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr23xx.cpp:202
+  // void g2(A a) { a.operator B decltype(B())::*(); }
+  // void h(A a) { a.operator identity<B>::type B::*(); }  
+  // void h2(A a) { a.operator B identity<B>::type::*(); } 
----------------
shafik wrote:
> Endill wrote:
> > shafik wrote:
> > > While gcc accepts the first three it does not like the last two: 
> > > https://godbolt.org/z/js8Pz14Eo
> > > 
> > > I believe they should also be covered but not confident.
> > I agree they should. I can't find any special considerations in the 
> > standard regarding unqualified name lookup of template arguments.
> > 
> > Are there any action items for me here?
> Yeah, can you file a gcc bug report for the last two? If they agree it is a 
> gcc but then we are all good, if not then we need to see what they say.
Upon closer inspection, I think I'm wrong to put those two tests that GCC does 
not accept:

1. [[ http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.lookup.unqual#5.sentence-1 | 
basic.lookup.unqual#5 ]]: `An unqualified name that is a component name of a 
type-specifier or ptr-operator of a conversion-type-id is looked up in the same 
fashion as the conversion-function-id in which it appears`

2. [[ http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.prim.id.unqual#2 | expr.prim.id.unqual#2 ]]: 
`A component name of an unqualified-id U is: — U if it is a name or; — the 
component name of the template-id or type-name of U, if any.`

3. [[ http://eel.is/c++draft/temp.names#2 | temp.names#2 ]]: `The component 
name of a simple-template-id, template-id, or template-name is the first name 
in it`

As I understand it now, `identity` is a component name of ptr-declarator and 
falls under "is looked up in the same fashion as the conversion-function-id in 
which it appears", but its argument `B` does not.




Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D142316/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D142316

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to