Endill added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr23xx.cpp:202
+ // void g2(A a) { a.operator B decltype(B())::*(); }
+ // void h(A a) { a.operator identity<B>::type B::*(); }
+ // void h2(A a) { a.operator B identity<B>::type::*(); }
----------------
shafik wrote:
> While gcc accepts the first three it does not like the last two:
> https://godbolt.org/z/js8Pz14Eo
>
> I believe they should also be covered but not confident.
I agree they should. I can't find any special considerations in the standard
regarding unqualified name lookup of template arguments.
Are there any action items for me here?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142316/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142316
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
