LuoYuanke added a comment. In D141899#4058683 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141899#4058683>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> In D141899#4058173 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141899#4058173>, @LuoYuanke > wrote: > >> @zixuan-wu, changing x86_amx would break our internal code. May I know the >> motivation to change the type? > > I just want to point out that generally "causes [too much] churn downstream" > is not relevant concern upstream, as downstreams are considered to be on > their own. But we previously design the amx type and we follow the design to develop and maintain both the upsteam code and downstream code. I think we should respect the orginal author's effort for developing and maintaining the code. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141899/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141899 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
