mstorsjo added a comment. In D141206#4034451 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141206#4034451>, @mstorsjo wrote:
> In D141206#4034159 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141206#4034159>, @mati865 wrote: > >> I had thought we do that already so this change looks reasonable for me. >> Just one thought, do we support multilib toolchains? I think in that case >> Clang would have to add `<base>/include` despite different triple. > > This patch actually does that already, see the parameter `RequireArchMatch` > which is set to true for the `<base>/lib` case and false for `<base>/include`. ... but thanks for considering and bringing up that case, I hadn't really thought much about that - I don't see multilib setups that often actually. Not sure if and/or how well they work with clang. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141206/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141206 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
