erichkeane added a comment.

I still want someone more familiar with LLVM to review this, but code wise I 
think we're ok (modulus 1 suggestion I made in checkFPMathBuiltinElementType).



================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:2674
+
+    if (MagnitudeTy.getCanonicalType() != SignTy.getCanonicalType()) {
+      return Diag(Sign.get()->getBeginLoc(),
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> erichkeane wrote:
> > arsenm wrote:
> > > arsenm wrote:
> > > > erichkeane wrote:
> > > > > arsenm wrote:
> > > > > > erichkeane wrote:
> > > > > > > curleys not used for single-statement if-statement bodies.
> > > > > > It covers 3 lines, it should have braces
> > > > > Our standard says 'statments' not 'lines'.  This is a single 
> > > > > statement.
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#don-t-use-braces-on-simple-single-statement-bodies-of-if-else-loop-statements
> > > > Also says 'Similarly, braces should be used when a single-statement 
> > > > body is complex enough that it becomes difficult to see where the block 
> > > > containing the following statement began.'
> > > > 
> > > > Which is any case where it covers multiple lines 
> > > Plus I'd go by clang-format does not add braces here
> > I don't see the 'difficult to see when the following statement began' bit 
> > in this code, particularly with the new line.
> > 
> > By policy, I don't think we have curleys here.  I'm of the opinion of 
> > 'almost always curleys', but our policy.
> I think a strict reading of our policy is that the preference is to elide the 
> braces in this case, but FWIW, I'm perfectly fine with leaving the braces in 
> as they (ever-so-slightly) improve the readability of the code given that it 
> spans multiple source lines.
Thanks, I really dislike that it is 'single statement' with some vague 
extensions, but not my decision :/


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D140639/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D140639

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to