benshi001 added a comment. In D139305#4013217 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139305#4013217>, @aykevl wrote:
> I think having `-mcpu` as an alias for `-mmcu` on AVR is fine, but I don't > think it's very useful to be honest. The `-mmcu` (or `-mcpu`) flag is > inherently specific to that particular chip anyway so compatibility is not an > issue. In fact, having two flags may even introduce noise and confusion. > I wouldn't be opposed to it though if there is demand for it. > > In D139305#3987969 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139305#3987969>, @MaskRay wrote: > >> Does GCC prefer `-mcpu=` as well? If not, raise a PR there? This seems like >> a decision we should not unilaterally make on llvm-project side: it's >> certainly something GCC cares about as well. > > I guess, but avr-gcc is already barely maintained. Most people use an older > version (like 5.2.0) because the newer versions produce absolutely terrible > code. So I don't think it matters much. I see. Thanks. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D139305/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D139305 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
