benshi001 added a comment. In D139305#3974946 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139305#3974946>, @MaskRay wrote:
> This makes `-mmcu=` available for non-AVR targets, which is not right. > Even for AVR, if this is a plain alias, is this really necessary? Usually > having more than one aliases for one functionality just create confusion as > users don't know which one is the canonical. > I think one choice is for AVR users to migrate `-mmcu=` (if any) to `-mcpu=`, > if there are a significant number of uses. Making a project buildable with > Clang usually requires porting efforts, and this request may not be > unreasonable. I have changed to 1. Both '-mcpu' and '-mmcu' are supported for AVR, and '-mmcu' is not available to others; 2. '-mcpu' is superior to '-mmcu', and '-mcpu' is encouraged for newer clang built AVR projects; 3. A warning will emit if both are specified. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D139305/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D139305 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
