beanz added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/AST/HLSL/RWBuffer-AST.hlsl:49-50
// CHECK-NEXT: ArraySubscriptExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>>
'element_type' lvalue
-// CHECK-NEXT: MemberExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> 'element_type *'
lvalue ->h 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}}
-// CHECK-NEXT: CXXThisExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> 'const
RWBuffer<element_type> *' implicit this
+// CHECK-NEXT: MemberExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> 'element_type *'
lvalue .h 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}}
+// CHECK-NEXT: CXXThisExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> 'const
RWBuffer<element_type>' lvalue implicit this
// CHECK-NEXT: DeclRefExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> 'unsigned int'
ParmVar 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} 'Idx' 'unsigned int'
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> `// CHECK-NEXT: MemberExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> 'element_type
> *' lvalue .h 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}}`
>
> I'm confused by this -- it says the type of the expression is `element_type
> *` but that it uses `.` as an operator instead of `->`. One of these seems
> like it is wrong, but perhaps I'm missing something.
Isn't that the type of the member not the type of the `this`? This example
seems to result in a pointer `MemberExpr` with a `.` access:
https://godbolt.org/z/j9f5nP4s6
This is a little awkward because we have a pointer member inside this struct
even though pointers are illegal in HLSL source :(
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D135721/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D135721
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
