tom-anders added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/CodeCompleteTests.cpp:2966
       {cls("nx::Clangd1"), cls("ny::Clangd2"), cls("Clangd3"),
-       cls("na::nb::Clangd4")},
+       cls("na::nb::Clangd4"), enmConstant("na::C::Clangd5")},
       Opts);
----------------
nridge wrote:
> nridge wrote:
> > Hmm, I don't think this type of test actually exercises the 
> > `isIndexedForCodeCompletion()` codepath (since we're just mocking out the 
> > index contents, instead of running the actual indexer).
> > 
> > Could we use [this 
> > type](https://searchfox.org/llvm/source/clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/CodeCompleteTests.cpp#3341-3359)
> >  instead?
> > 
> > (Sorry, this is partly my fault for not looking more carefully at what 
> > sorts of tests are in CodeCompleteTests.cpp before my earlier comment.)
> (Indeed, this test passes even without the change to CodeComplete.cpp.)
Ah right, no problem, I didn't see that there also tests in that file that 
don't mock out the index, I added a test similar to the one you mentioned.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D136925/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D136925

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to