nridge added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/CodeCompleteTests.cpp:2966
{cls("nx::Clangd1"), cls("ny::Clangd2"), cls("Clangd3"),
- cls("na::nb::Clangd4")},
+ cls("na::nb::Clangd4"), enmConstant("na::C::Clangd5")},
Opts);
----------------
nridge wrote:
> Hmm, I don't think this type of test actually exercises the
> `isIndexedForCodeCompletion()` codepath (since we're just mocking out the
> index contents, instead of running the actual indexer).
>
> Could we use [this
> type](https://searchfox.org/llvm/source/clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/CodeCompleteTests.cpp#3341-3359)
> instead?
>
> (Sorry, this is partly my fault for not looking more carefully at what sorts
> of tests are in CodeCompleteTests.cpp before my earlier comment.)
(Indeed, this test passes even without the change to CodeComplete.cpp.)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136925/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136925
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
