tra added a comment. I would argue that parallel compilation and linking may need to be disabled by default. I believe similar patches were discussed in the past regarding sub-compilations, but they are relevant for parallel linking, too. Google search shows D52193 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D52193>, but I believe there were other attempts in the past. @yaxunl - I vaguely recall that we did discuss parallel HIP/CUDA compilation in the past, but I can't find the details.
These days most of the builds are parallel already and it's very likely that the build system already launches as many jobs as there are CPUs available. Making each compilation launch multiple parallel subcompilations would likely result in way too many simultaneously running processes. Granted, linking is done less often than compilation, so having parallel linking may be lucky to be the last remaining process in the parallel build, but it's not unusual to have multiple linker processes running simultaneously during the build either. Linking is often the most resource-heavy part of the build, so I would not be surprised if even a few linker instances would cause problems if they spawn parallel sub-linking jobs. Having parallel subcompilations may be useful in some cases -- e.g. distributed compilation with one compilation per remote worker w/ multiple CPUs available on the worker, but that's unlikely to be a common scenario. Having deterministic output is also very important, both for the build repeatability/provenance tracking and for the build system's cache hit rates. Reliably cached slow repeatable compilation will be a net win over fast, but unstable compilation that causes cache churn and triggers more things to be rebuilt. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D136701/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D136701 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
