aaron.ballman added a comment.
In D134453#3871386 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134453#3871386>, @dblaikie wrote:
>> In terms of next steps, I think we should try to see if there's a "clear"
>> path forward in terms of printing the types vs not printing the types. If we
>> find one, then great, we go that way. But if we don't seem to have a clear
>> path forward (relatively quickly; I don't think we want to drag this
>> discussion on for months trying to find the perfect answer), then I think
>> I'm fine with the patch as-is. It fixes the issue of `t<{}>` (with empty
>> braces specifically) while retaining the status quo in other areas, but
>> still exposes useful functionality through the additional printing policy.
>> Does that sound reasonable?
>
> If you reckon (1) is better overall anyway - happy enough to defer to your
> opinion there and go with that, skip/omit the printing policy.
Okay, thanks for that! I'm still happy to consider alternatives if we can think
of any, FWIW.
> I think the policy is like adding off-by-default warnings, and supporting a
> use case (using the string name for reflection when we'd recommend the AST) I
> don't think we want to encourage/support.
That's a fair point. So if we find no better approach, drop the policy and just
always print types.
> Admittedly going with (1) means that @DoDoENT's use case will then work,
> until/unless we come back around and make more strategic use of type names in
> this printing in the future to bring down the verbosity - so I'd still
> discourage that use case & warn that this isn't a guarantee that all type
> names will be included going forward.
Absolutely agreed! IMO, whatever strings you get out of something with a
printing policy generally have very little/no stability guarantees (it's part
of the C++ API surface, so it's exactly as stable as any other C++ API). We'll
change printing behavior whenever we feel the need to.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134453/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134453
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
