DoDoENT added a comment. In D134453#3868789 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134453#3868789>, @dblaikie wrote:
> I still don't think "keep full NTTP type printing behind a policy, for those > that want/need that" is a policy we should add. String printed names aren't > meant to be a tool for type reflection - the AST can be queried for that > information. I agree on that matter. However, I'm building my clang with this policy enabled by default to provide my developers with GCC/MSVC-like verbosity in diagnostic messages. They prefer it that way. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134453/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134453 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
