jansvoboda11 added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/ClangScanDeps/modules-full-by-mod-name.cpp:18 // -// RUN: clang-scan-deps -compilation-database %t_clangcl.cdb -j 4 -format experimental-full \ +// RUN: clang-scan-deps -compilation-database %t_clangcl.cdb -j 1 -format experimental-full \ // RUN: -mode preprocess-dependency-directives -module-name=header1 > %t_clangcl.result ---------------- DavidSpickett wrote: > Would it help to have one be j1 and one j4, any extra coverage by doing that? Technically that does give us extra coverage. Let's do it if you feel more comfortable that way. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D136124/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D136124 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
