royjacobson added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/TokenKinds.def:528
+TYPE_TRAIT_1(__is_nothrow_copy_constructible, IsNothrowCopyConstructible, 
KEYCXX)
+TYPE_TRAIT_1(__is_trivially_copy_constructible, IsTriviallyCopyConstructible, 
KEYCXX)
 TYPE_TRAIT_2(__reference_binds_to_temporary, ReferenceBindsToTemporary, KEYCXX)
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> cjdb wrote:
> > erichkeane wrote:
> > > So this one is a whole 'thing'.  The Clang definition of 'trivially copy 
> > > constructible' is a few DRs behind.  We should probably discuss this with 
> > > libcxx to make sure use of this wouldn't be broken.
> > I'd prefer to get those DRs in before finalising D135238 and subsequent 
> > ones. Do you know the DR numbers I should be looking at, or should I just 
> > poke npaperbot?
> Not off the top of my head, Aaron and I both poked at it at one point trying 
> to get trivially constructible right at one point, but I think we both gave 
> up due to the ABI/versioning concerns.
Maybe DR1734? Although it's about the trivially copyable trait, not trivially 
copy constructible. 



Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D135238/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D135238

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to