jhuber6 added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/AMDGPU.cpp:717
 AMDGPUToolChain::getGPUArch(const llvm::opt::ArgList &DriverArgs) const {
-  return getProcessorFromTargetID(
-      getTriple(), DriverArgs.getLastArgValue(options::OPT_mcpu_EQ));
+  if (DriverArgs.hasArg(options::OPT_mcpu_EQ))
+    return getProcessorFromTargetID(
----------------
yaxunl wrote:
> jhuber6 wrote:
> > yaxunl wrote:
> > > can we emit an error if both -march and -mcpu are specified and the 
> > > values are different? This is a potential source of error.
> > I'm not exactly sure about the semantics for this, maybe someone else can 
> > help. AFAIK `-mcpu` is sometimes treated as an alias of `-mtune` which is 
> > generally implied by `-march`. But having `-march` and `-mtune` state 
> > different things isn't technically disallowed. `-march` seems to imply that 
> > we generate code that can run on a certain architecture. Since these are in 
> > some respects equivalent it would probably be fine to just take the last 
> > one specified.
> Some toolchains use -march to specify the target processor, some toolchains 
> use -mcpu to specify the target processor. For AMDGPU toolchain, it uses 
> -mcpu to specify the target processor in the beginning for OpenCL. Then we 
> add HIP support and let HIPAMD toolchain adopt using -mcpu to specify the 
> target processor. It is better to have a consistent way for specifying target 
> processor for AMDGPU toolchains.
> 
> HIPAMD toolchain does this by 
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/HIPAMD.cpp#L275
>  .
> 
> Probably AMDGPUOpenMP toolchain can make a similar change? Then we have a 
> consistent way to specify target processor for AMDGPU toolchains.
The rest of the OpenMP toolchain uses `-march` so I don't see a compelling 
reason to change it. If this is a stopper I'll just remove the changes to this 
function and check `-march` directly in the new `getROCmDeviceLibs` function 
for the OpenMP toolchain.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D133726/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D133726

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to