ldionne added a comment.

In D132324#3742406 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D132324#3742406>, @aaron.ballman 
wrote:

> For clarity, @ldionne are you requesting that these changes be reverted due 
> to being incomplete, or do you prefer this be fixed forward?

Sorry, I left no action item on my end after my first comment. I'm wrapping my 
head around this change and the other changes that followed D132298 
<https://reviews.llvm.org/D132298> and D132411 
<https://reviews.llvm.org/D132411> first, and I'll post here what I think we 
should do. I've also seen some internal fallout of this change and I suspect 
I'm not alone.

Like I said, I greatly appreciate that folks took the lead to push this removal 
forward, however it should have been under review for more than 24h on a 
week-end. Concretely, what I planned on doing was turn the `message(WARNING` 
into `message(ERROR` as a dye test without changing anything else, and then 
turn it back on to `message(WARNING` to give folks a bit of time to fix their 
up/downstream CI systems (to avoid them being red for too long).

I'll post here again when I've wrapped my head around this.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D132324/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D132324

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to