ychen added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:580 + I = DelayedCXXInitPosition.find(D); + unsigned LexOrder = I == DelayedCXXInitPosition.end() ? ~0U : I->second; + AddGlobalCtor(Fn, 65535, LexOrder, COMDATKey); ---------------- efriedma wrote: > ychen wrote: > > efriedma wrote: > > > This ensures delayed initialization calls are ordered relative to each > > > other... but are they ordered correctly relative to non-delayed > > > initialization calls? I'm skeptical that using a LexOrder of "~0U" is > > > really correct. (For example, if you change the variable "b" in your > > > testcase to a struct with a destructor.) > > Hmm, That's a great point. I didn't think of that. I'll take a look. > Using `CXXGlobalInits.size()` like this is sort of hard to reason about: > multiple values can end up with the same LexOrder. (I'm not sure if all the > values with the same LexOrder end up sorted correctly.) > > Instead of trying to reason about whether this is right, can we just use a > separate counter to assign a unique index to each global init? Agreed that this whole thing is confusing if not looked at closely. IIUC, LexOrder is unique for each global variables and all global variables with an initialization are pushed into `CXXGlobalInits` in lexing order regardless of deferred/non-deferred emission. I could add a counter which basically tracks the size of `CXXGlobalInits`. Which do you think is more clear: add an explicit counter or add more comments to `CXXGlobalInits` explaining the usage? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D127233/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D127233 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
