aaron.ballman added a comment. In D127233#3726613 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D127233#3726613>, @rjmccall wrote:
> There's no compiler interoperation problem here; it's just a semantic concern > that someone could've been relying on the old behavior. The new behavior is > (AIUI) clearly required by the language standard, and I don't think we want > to get into the business of providing "do the old buggy thing" flags for > everything we fix like this. Thanks for verifying! (I agree that we don't want to get into the business of providing flags for old buggy behavior, too.) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D127233/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D127233 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
