MaskRay marked 2 inline comments as done. MaskRay added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/SanitizerSpecialCaseList.rst:108 +caution. It may still be useful, e.g. when patterns are picked in a way to +ensure the prevailing one is ignored. + ---------------- Added: ``(There is an action at a distance risk.)`` ================ Comment at: clang/docs/SanitizerSpecialCaseList.rst:110-112 +``mainsrc`` can be useful enabling a ubsan check for a large code base when +finding the direct stack frame triggering the failure for every failure is +difficult. ---------------- vitalybuka wrote: > if this is transitionalt solution, would it be better just to use > -fno-sanitize= on *.cpp file? This provides a more convenient way than using `-fno-sanitize=` for a different set of files. E.g. if a group wants to ignore a check for all ``[a-m]*` files, then can use `mainsrc:[a-m]*` instead of patching the build system. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D129832/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D129832 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
