anton-afanasyev added a comment. In D128625#3621030 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128625#3621030>, @MaskRay wrote:
> The description seems unclear to me. Is a `riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu` GCC > installation selected while the requested target triple is > `riscv64-unknown-elf`? Yes, exactly (see precommitted tests 4ee6b7806bc0 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG4ee6b7806bc04e3d037c0679260a54828ce7ad4c>: adding one more target directory confuses driver, mixing triples in paths). Adjusting description to be more clear. > This could be an instance of > https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-fix-loose-behaviors-of-clang-target/60272 > (`[RFC] Fix loose behaviors of Clang –target=`) and the right fix may be > somewhere upper level. This looks related but not the same one: this patch fixes the incorrect use of completely different targets. I believe this issue could be addressed on top of your RFC implemented, need to refactor triple, setting equivalence of triples explicitly. Anyway, I'd like to have this patch committed meanwhile: it is more related to how `RISCVToolchain` uses baremetal `GCCInstallation` for the current state. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128625/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128625 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
