paulkirth accepted this revision.
paulkirth added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

LGTM.



================
Comment at: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:447
+  structures *without* a ``DW_AT_name`` field, which is valid DWARF, but may
+  lead to assertion failures in some software.
+
----------------
nit: its likely not an assertion failure, but just invalid code.

It's also fine w/ me to word this differently, or ignore the suggestion.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D126224/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D126224

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to