paulwalker-arm added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Sema/aarch64-sve2-intrinsics/acle_sve2_imm_n.cpp:25
+{
+ // expected-error-re@+1 3 {{argument value {{[0-9]+}} is outside the valid
range [0, 7]}}
+ EXPAND_XZM_FUNC(SVE_ACLE_FUNC(svqshlu,_n_s8,,), pg, svundef_s8(), -1);
----------------
I've not seen this before, presumably it's short hand instead of needing to
repeat multiple identical `expected-error` check lines? If so, is it worth
using this throughout the test files and essentially only require one
`expected-error` per function or does this only work here because the
`EXPAND...` macro emits its three function calls on the same line?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D123605/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D123605
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
