python3kgae added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td:3978
+                            "compute", "raygeneration", "intersection",
+                            "anyhit", "closestHit", "miss", "callable", "mesh",
+                            "amplification"],
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> `anyhit` vs `closestHit` in terms of capitalization seems a bit surprising to 
> me -- is that intentional?
Good catch. It is not intentional.


================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td:6386-6388
+The ``shader`` attribute applies to HLSL shader entry functions to identify the
+ shader stage for the entry function.
+  }];
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Please add enough documentation that a user has a chance to use this feature 
> properly (and it's fine to link to other documentation for more details if 
> there's canonical documentation elsewhere that we don't want to duplicate).
I'll fix this.


================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:11598-11599
 def err_hlsl_attribute_param_mismatch : Error<"%0 attribute parameters do not 
match the previous declaration">;
+def err_hlsl_invalid_attribute_argument : Error<
+  "%0 attribute argument not supported: %1">;
 
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Almost every other attribute warns on this situation and then ignores the 
> attribute; why should this be a hard error? (A warning allows other 
> implementations to support more enumeration values without breaking the 
> user's code in Clang.)
I'll change it to warning.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp:6944-6947
+  if (AL.getNumArgs() != 1) {
+    S.Diag(AL.getLoc(), diag::err_attribute_wrong_number_arguments) << AL << 1;
+    return;
+  }
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Hmm, doesn't the common attribute handling logic already deal with this case? 
> (It does for other attribute syntaxes, but we have almost no attributes using 
> the Microsoft `[]` syntax, so I wouldn't be surprised if we need to add that 
> logic.)
I'll double check it I can remove this.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp:6961
+
+  // TODO: check function match the shader stage.
+
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Are you planning to do this TODO as part of this patch, or is this a FIXME 
> someone needs to handle later?
It is a FIXME.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D123907/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D123907

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to