aaron.ballman added a comment. I'm not opposed, but this does muddy the waters about the target-specific nature of the attribute. Currently, the semantic attribute cannot be used outside of Itanium ABI targets, so it doesn't work on Windows (and we don't want it to -- Microsoft hasn't picked their ABI for the standard attribute and we want to avoid ABI breaks). But should we pick an ABI for the GNU attribute on Windows and just assume that Microsoft gets no say in the ABI for that because it's not their vendor extension? Or, if we disallow the GNU spelling on Windows because we want it to match the ABI of the standard attribute, does it actually help libc++ to expose the GNU spelling?
Also, the change is missing test coverage and a release note. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122874/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122874 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
