jhuber6 added a comment. In D122592#3411877 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122592#3411877>, @jdoerfert wrote:
> In D122592#3411812 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122592#3411812>, @MaskRay wrote: > >> In D122592#3411795 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122592#3411795>, @ye-luo wrote: >> >>>> using the multiarch directory >>> >>> If we can cross compile libomp and libomptarget to the target system. We >>> may have >>> lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libomp.so >>> lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/libomp.so >>> Compile clang once but compile runtime library for multiple architectures. >> >> Yes, mostly for deambiguating cross compiling and multilib style -m32/-m64. >> In addition, I think all LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES projects but openmp switched >> to lib/$triple/xxx.so for runtime libraries, e.g. libc++.so, libc++abi.so, >> libunwind.a. >> By switching openmp we will improve consistency. Downstream distributions >> can use the same way to install runtime libraries, instead of doing >> different things for openmp and non-openmp. > > I'm all for it ;). Assuming @jhuber6 is not looking at that right now we need > an issue to track this. Sounds good, I won't look at it immediately but I could set up an issue to track the transition. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122592/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122592 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
