jdoerfert added a comment. In D122592#3411812 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122592#3411812>, @MaskRay wrote:
> In D122592#3411795 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122592#3411795>, @ye-luo wrote: > >>> using the multiarch directory >> >> If we can cross compile libomp and libomptarget to the target system. We may >> have >> lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libomp.so >> lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/libomp.so >> Compile clang once but compile runtime library for multiple architectures. > > Yes, mostly for deambiguating cross compiling and multilib style -m32/-m64. > In addition, I think all LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES projects but openmp switched to > lib/$triple/xxx.so for runtime libraries, e.g. libc++.so, libc++abi.so, > libunwind.a. > By switching openmp we will improve consistency. Downstream distributions can > use the same way to install runtime libraries, instead of doing different > things for openmp and non-openmp. I'm all for it ;). Assuming @jhuber6 is not looking at that right now we need an issue to track this. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122592/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122592 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
