dblaikie added a comment. In D120989#3362912 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120989#3362912>, @kavitha-natarajan wrote:
> In D120989#3362491 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120989#3362491>, @dblaikie > wrote: > >> In D120989#3362490 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120989#3362490>, @dblaikie >> wrote: >> >>> Broad question about debug info for aliases: How's this proposed solution >>> compare/contrast to GCC's behavior? >> >> Aaand, I see that was described in thhe patch description. Sorry for not >> reading... >> >> Right, paging in all the context - this review hinges on whether gdb/lldb >> can handle/be made to handle this sort of debug info correctly. > > I have posted a gdb patch to handle this change for review: > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-March/186329.html > > lldb can handle this debug info correctly. Thanks for the details - can you ping this thread once the gdb thread has progressed/seems like it's moving in this direction? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D120989/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D120989 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
