njames93 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py:240-249
+ color_group = parser.add_mutually_exclusive_group()
+ color_group.add_argument('-use-color', action='store_true', dest='use_color',
+ help='Use colors in diagnostics, overriding
clang-tidy\'s default '
+ 'behavior. This option overrides the \'UseColor\'
option in'
+ '.clang-tidy file, if any.')
+ color_group.add_argument('-no-use-color', action='store_false',
dest='use_color',
+ help='Do not use colors in diagnostics, overriding
clang-tidy\'s default'
----------------
All the arguments to this script mirror clang-tidy arguments, therefore I'm
against introducing gnc style command line flags for controlling colour output.
I'd suggest something like this which mirrors clang-tidys behaviour much more
closely,
This requires an import
```lang=py
from distutils.util import strtobool```
Tbh it may be better writing a strtobool that is in sync with llvms command
line bool parser
```
{ "true", "TRUE", "True", "1"` -> true }
{ "false", "FALSE", "False", "0" -> false }
{ ... -> Error }
```
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119562/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119562
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
