kesyog added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py:96
+ start.append('--use-color')
+ elif use_color is not None:
+ start.append('--use-color=false')
----------------
Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> Shouldn't it be just `else:`?
There are three cases:
| Argument | `use_color` | Behavior |
| `-use-color` | `True` | `--use-color` is passed to clang-tidy, force enabling
color |
| `-no-use-color` | `False` | `--use-color=false` is passed to clang-tidy,
force disabling color |
| (none provided) | `None` | Nothing passed to clang-tidy. clang-tidy follows
its default coloring behavior |
The case on the highlighted line is the second row of the table, and we have to
check that `use_color` is not `None` to exclude the case of the third row.
I was trying to avoid the extra nesting of something like below, but maybe the
intent would be clearer?
```
if use_color is not None:
if use_color:
start.append('--use-color')
else:
start.append('--use-color=false')
```
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119562/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119562
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
