Chenbing.Zheng marked 8 inline comments as done. Chenbing.Zheng added a comment.
In D117468#3255546 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117468#3255546>, @craig.topper wrote: > In D117468#3253879 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117468#3253879>, > @Chenbing.Zheng wrote: > >> In D117468#3253493 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117468#3253493>, @craig.topper >> wrote: >> >>> Out of curiosity, what is your interest in Zbt? Do you work for a company >>> that is implementing this extension in hardware? >> >> My company has not implementing this extension，but may be in the future. I'm >> just doing a pre-research. > > The Zbt extensions and the other un-ratified extension from the old Bitmanip > spec have not seen any active discussion for at least the last 6-9 months. If > that continues, it starts to raise questions about whether llvm should > continue to support and extension that does not appear to be on a path to > ratification. I've asked for a discussion on this topic at the next RISCV > LLVM bi-weekly sync meeting tomorrow morning US time. calendar link here > https://llvm.org/docs/GettingInvolved.html#online-sync-ups Thanks a lot, I will keep watching it. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D117468/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D117468 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
