craig.topper added a comment. In D117468#3253879 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117468#3253879>, @Chenbing.Zheng wrote:
> In D117468#3253493 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117468#3253493>, @craig.topper > wrote: > >> Out of curiosity, what is your interest in Zbt? Do you work for a company >> that is implementing this extension in hardware? > > My company has not implementing this extension，but may be in the future. I'm > just doing a pre-research. The Zbt extensions and the other un-ratified extension from the old Bitmanip spec have not seen any active discussion for at least the last 6-9 months. If that continues, it starts to raise questions about whether llvm should continue to support and extension that does not appear to be on a path to ratification. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D117468/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D117468 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
