hans added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D21113#452673, @thakis wrote:
> Not sure if we want a flag that adds 50% overhead, no matter how convenient > it might be :-/ I now have a version of the patch that caches directory contents that it lists: real 2m31.461s user 68m42.090s sys 1m51.707s While the sys time is a little bit higher, real time is on par with putting the SDK on FAT, so I think this is still worth pursuing. I need to clean up the patch and figure out how to invalidate the cache after module things are written, though. http://reviews.llvm.org/D21113 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
