erichkeane added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Parser/cxx2b-init-statement.cpp:19
+
+ if (using enum ns::e; false){} // expected-error {{expected '='}}
+
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> erichkeane wrote:
> > Is there any way to have this elaborate more? The 'expected 'TOKEN'' is my
> > least favorite type of error. Could we change this to be something like,
> > 'expected '=' in type alias' or something?
> FWIW, I'm fine with the diagnostic as-is because I don't expect anyone to
> actually *use* this functionality, so I don't expect a ton of users to hit
> this. I'd say it's fine to address when a user files a bug showing some code
> where the diagnostic is unclear.
I'm sad by this, and Aaron points out it is a bit of a hassle, so I can
disagree & commit here.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D111175/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D111175
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
